According to the Centers for Disease Control, more than 60% of women of reproductive age use some type of birth control. While most birth control methods are relatively safe for the women who use them, there have been types that have unfortunately caused unwanted side effects or dangers for women.
The Essure device is one such case, where a company ended up seriously injuring the women who turned to the device for their preferred method of birth control.
What was Essure?
Essure was a birth control implant that came into the American market in 2002. It was manufactured by Bayer and used by many women. Problems and concerns began surfacing as early as 2016. While Bayer chose to stop selling the device outside of the United States in 2017, it did not pull the device from America until mid-2018.
What were injuries caused by Essure?
Unfortunately, women who used Essure were at an increased risk for serious health complications and side effects. The general injuries sustained by women who used Essure include pelvic pain, autoimmune diseases, and perforated injuries. Here at MacCloskey Kesler & Associates, we are currently working with clients who have had to have hysterectomies due to injuries and complications caused by Essure.
What happens now?
The Essure birth control device had serious problems and the implant was not pulled in enough time to reduce the risk for the women who used it. There is currently a major lawsuit to hold Bayer accountable for medical costs and compensation for women injured by Essure.
If you used the Essure device and have experienced complications, now is the time to contact the team at MacCloskey Kesler & Associates. We are working hard for our clients who were injured due to Essure and can provide you with the individualized attention that a nationwide firm can simply not provide.
Give us a call to tell us more about your situation, or to inquire if you could be entitled to compensation for your injuries or conditions caused by Essure. We promise to work hard for you and to get you a positive outcome.
When you are seeking compensation for a personal injury or wrongful death event, you are thrust into a legal world that you may not have known about before. It is overwhelming to attempt to contend with large insurance companies on your own, and having an experienced attorney by your side can increase the chance of a positive outcome (as well as alleviate quite a bit of your stress). However, even the most experienced attorney can be timid to take your case all the way into a courtroom. Are you missing out if you don’t go in front of a judge?
Why don’t cases go to trial?
Most personal injury and wrongful death cases do not go to trial. In fact, some statistics demonstrate less than 10% of cases like yours make it into a courtroom. Why is this? Mainly, attorneys for the injured and for the defendants prefer to solve the matter before it goes to trial.
Trials can be expensive and require extra staff time. Attorneys will need to be on their game, arguing their case live in front of a judge and jury. Many attorneys prefer to keep their arguing in a boardroom and out of court.
Should my case go to trial?
Every case is different, but it is important to seek out an attorney that is not afraid to take your case to trial if necessary. When you search for an attorney to represent you, assure you find one that has a recent track record of success in the courtroom as well as in pretrial settlements. If you have an attorney who is too timid to go to trial, you may not receive the compensation you ultimately deserve.
At MacCloskey Kesler and Associates, we have a serious track record of successful outcomes for our clients – in and out of court. We have found that going to trial is necessary in many cases in order to get the maximum compensation for those we represent. We are not afraid to go toe-to-toe with insurance companies in a courtroom, and we are ready to guide you through that process as well.
Give us a call today to tell us more about your situation. We would love to partner with you to give you a positive outcome.
With all the recent attention to gun violence in our country, we thought it might be helpful to point out that many Homeowners’ Insurance Policies cover injuries caused by accidental shootings on your property. The shooting must be attributed to negligence of the home owner.
This negligence can take many forms, and really is only limited by the imagination of your attorney. Was the gun left loaded and where children could easily find it? Were there no trigger guards or were the guns not kept in a safe? Was a member of the family showing it to a friend when it discharged?
We prosecuted a case like that about 25 years ago, and the case went to trial. The defense wanted to hint to the jury that it was some kind of dope deal gone bad, resulting in the home owner’s son shooting my client. There was no evidence of drugs being present, and we were able to prove that it was just two teenagers playing with a loaded gun. The defendant home owner’s son was showing the gun to our client and didn’t know how to handle the gun and didn’t realize it was loaded until it went off. We were able to our client a very nice jury verdict based on that negligence.
On Friday, May 19, 2017, we closed the office to play hooky and go to a Chicago Cubs baseball game at Wrigley Field. They were playing Division Rivals the Milwaukee Brewers. The weather the week running up to that Friday was beautiful; temperatures were in the 70’s with no rain in sight.
Naturally, the forecast for the 19th was for temperatures in the 50’s with a 70% chance of rain. Luckily for us, we had tickets at one of the rooftop clubs, so even if it was cold we’d still be warm and dry, with plenty of food and beverages.
We boarded a bus in downtown Rockford at 10am to make the trip in for the 1:20 start time. Everyone from the office went, and most brought along their spouses or significant others. We had a whole tour bus to ourselves.
We got into Chicago about 12:30, and because of the traffic around Wrigley, the bus had to park a few blocks away. By this time it was starting to spit a little rain, but we decided to lean into the wind and rain and make the trek. Once we got to the building, we ascended several flights of stairs to the enclosed rooftop restaurant/lounge area.
If you’ve never experienced seeing a game on one of the rooftops around Wrigley, I highly recommend it. There’s comfortable seating, open bar and all the dogs and burgers you want. If you climb up one more flight of stairs you’re on the actual rooftop, and you can see the field spread out in front of you. We were behind right/center field. It was just beautiful. By climbing up the last flight you can sit on bleachers and have an unobstructed view of the field. As cold and nasty as it was, most of us chose to stay inside and watch the game on the many big screen TV’s in the restaurant/lounge area.
The game started badly for the Cubs. The starting pitcher walked the first three batters in both the first and second innings, and had about 70 pitches thrown through the first three. They quickly got into a hole. They clawed their way back and went up by one in the top of the fifth, but by then it was raining pretty hard. In the bottom of the fifth pitching failed the Cubs again and there were a couple more walks and a couple singles, and it was all but over. At the end of the fifth they brought out the tarp for the infield, and we knew it was going to be, at a minimum, a long rain delay. All things considered, we decided to call it a day. Listening to the game on the way home, after a couple hour delay, we found out Milwaukee held on for the victory.
It wasn’t a good day for the Cubs, but it sure was nice to take the whole MacCloskey Kesler office out to the ball game for an extra day off. It’s nice to be able to do stuff like that from time to time to reward our wonderful staff for all their hard work and to just blow off some steam. I’m hoping we make it a yearly outing, but next year we’ll probably go in June!
Twenty five year old “Frank” (not his real name) was a client of ours whose case just settled. In October of 2015, Frank was riding his motorcycle when a car pulled from a stop sign on a side street directly in front of him. Frank had no choice but to hit the car. The driver of the car said she couldn’t see Frank because the sun was in her eyes.
As a result of the impact, Frank sustained a fractured pelvis, fractured left arm, fractured jaw, fractured eye sockets, fractured teeth and two brain bleeds. Frank was transported to the hospital by ambulance where he spent time in the Intensive Care Ward and then time as an inpatient.
He then required six months of medical treatment to get back on his feet, and lost several months of work. He will have permanent pain and suffering as a result of his severe injuries. He sometimes walks with a limp and still gets headaches.
Frank’s bills were over $300,000. He had no health insurance to pay the bills, having just started his job. Additionally, the “at fault driver” only had a $100,000 policy of insurance, and no assets that could be reached to satisfy any judgment that we could get on Frank’s behalf. If there would have been a $1,000,000 policy involved we could have justified forcing the insurance company to pay us that on Frank’s behalf for his severe and permanent injuries. Frank only had a $25,000 policy so we couldn’t look to his policy under the terms of his Underinsured Motorist Protection.
A word about Underinsured Motorist Coverage. If you are injured by someone whose insurance policy is too small to fully compensate you for the injuries sustained by their negligence, you can look to your own car insurance policy to make up the difference. But, you must have policy limits bigger than the underinsured driver. So looking ahead, always get the highest car insurance policy limits you can afford to cover yourself in case this happens to you. In Frank’s case, he didn’t. That creates a dilemma.
At MacCloskey Kesler & Associates, we have seen this sad scenario many times, and we are well aware of ways to negotiate bills and liens in some cases and force medical providers to take lower amounts than the face value of the bill in others. This can save tens of thousands of dollars or more.
In Frank’s case, we were able to get him set up with Medicaid, and force the medical providers who would not accept Medicaid to take pennies on the dollar. The net result? Even after paying us a one third contingent fee and repaying Medicaid and the medical providers, Frank walked away with over $44,000.
Consider that. He had over $300,000 in medical bills, and we were able to pay ALL THOSE BILLS IN FULL, pay our fee, and Frank walked away with over $44,000 in net compensation (which is not income to him, by the way), when there was only $100,000 that we were able to recover.
That’s what experienced lawyers like MacCloskey Kesler & Associates can do for you. So if you’ve been injured in a motorcycle, car or truck accident, call us at 815-965-2000 today for a free consultation. Put our passion, knowledge and experience to work for you.
Personal injury attorneys Kim MacCloskey and Phil Kesler have been members of the prestigious Multi -Million Dollar Advocates Forum since 2012. In order to be named to this forum, Kim and Phil were required to show that they acted as Principle Counsel in one or more cases that resulted in a final Judgment, award or settlement in favor of their client in the amount of two million dollars or more.
The initial case that brought such recommendation was tried in December, 2006. Kim and Phil tried this case in DeKalb County, Illinois, which involved a 48 year old man who was hit by a pickup truck on a rural highway in northern Illinois several years earlier. He sustained a traumatic amputation of his left leg at the scene, multiple fractures to his left (dominant) arm, rib fractures, and a fractured neck. He would have bled to death at the scene had a nurse not been there to apply a tourniquet literally within minutes. He later developed compartment syndrome requiring surgeries on both arms, and underwent over 20 surgeries in all and had over one million dollars in medical bills. He injured his vocal cords and could barely talk, which made it very difficult to teach his classes at the High School where he was employed, but through hard work he was able to resume teaching. The $6.2 million verdict included $750,000 for his wife’s loss of consortium, which was just short of a DeKalb County record.
It is an honor to be members of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum and to be recognized for our hard work in bringing this case to a successful verdict.